Five people are facing terrorist sentences for cracking windows and spraying paint at a high-street bank. They were never charged with terrorism. No jury was ever asked whether it was terrorism. The question was raised only after the trial had already ended.
You are charged with criminal damage. The jury is asked one question: did they break the windows? Obvious answer. Guilty.
Only then does the judge decide whether the offence had a “terrorist connection.” If it did, the sentence lengthens, automatic release disappears, licence and police monitoring extend for years, and parole can turn on renouncing your beliefs.
Same consequences as a terrorism conviction. Without a terrorism charge. Without a terrorism verdict. Without twelve citizens ever being asked.
A state that can rename protest as terrorism after the verdict can do it to any movement, on any Monday, for any cause. Climate. Housing. Wages. Yours. This is the moment it is cheapest to stop — before September, before the precedent hardens, while it still takes a judge’s discretion rather than a jury’s consent.
Move it through your union branch, your workplace, your student body. A day the country does not run is an argument Parliament cannot ignore.
Preston Crown Court, September. Sentencing happens in public for a reason. Be the public.
Most people have not heard this. Post the two numbers. £500,000 walked. £212,805 may be terrorism.
Demand s.69 be amended so no one is sentenced as a terrorist without a jury finding it. Quote Hansard back at them.